Appendix: Reported Juvenile Court Cases Disposed in 1995, by County (Continued)
Table Notes
Alabama
Source: | Alabama Department of Youth Services |
Mode: | Automated data file |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
Alaska
Source: | Alaska Court System |
Mode: | 1995 Annual Report, pages S-36 and S-56 |
Data: | 1. Total figures are children�s matters dispositions. They include delinquency, status offense, and dependency cases for fiscal year 1995. |
| 2. The majority of juvenile cases are processed at the superior court level. However, the following district courts handled and reported children�s matters in fiscal year 1995 Cordova, Craig, Dillingham, Glennallen, Naknek, Seward, Tok, and Unalaska. |
Arizona
Source: | Supreme Court of Arizona, Administrative Office of the Courts |
Mode: | JCS survey form |
Data: | 1. Dependency figures are cases disposed. |
Maricopa County
Source: | Maricopa County Juvenile Court Center (delinquency and status cases) and the Supreme Court of Arizona, Administrative Office of the Courts |
Mode: | Automated data file (delinquency and status cases) |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
Arkansas
Source: | Administrative Office of the Courts |
Mode: | Automated data file |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
| 3. Dependency figures are cases disposed. |
California
Source: | Administrative Office of the Courts, Judicial Council of California |
Mode: | Statistical pages sent to NCJJ |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
| 3. Dependency figures are cases disposed. The AOC supplied dependency figures for all counties, including those counties that independently provided their automated delinquency and status offense data to NCJJ. |
| 4. Data for Colusa and Humboldt counties are incomplete. |
Alameda County
Source: | Alameda County Probation Department (delinquency and status cases) |
Mode: | Automated data file (delinquency and status cases) |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
Kings County
Source: | Kings County Probation Department (delinquency and status cases) |
Mode: | Automated data file (delinquency and status cases) |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
Los Angeles County
Source: | Los Angeles County Probation Department (delinquency and status cases) |
Mode: | Automated data file (delinquency and status cases) |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
Orange County
Source: | Orange County Probation Department (delinquency and status cases) |
Mode: | Automated data file (delinquency and status cases) |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
San Bernardino County
Source: | San Bernardino County Probation Department (delinquency and status cases) |
Mode: | Automated data file (delinquency and status cases) |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed.
|
San Diego County
Source: | San Diego County Probation Department (delinquency and status cases) |
Mode: | Automated data file (delinquency and status cases) |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
San Francisco County
Source: | San Francisco County Juvenile Probation Department (delinquency and status cases) |
Mode: | Automated data file (delinquency and status cases) |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
San Joaquin County
Source: | San Joaquin County Probation Department (delinquency and status cases) |
Mode: | Automated data file (delinquency and status cases) |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
Santa Barbara County
Source: | Santa Barbara County Probation Department (delinquency and status cases) |
Mode: | Automated data file (delinquency and status cases) |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
Santa Clara County
Source: | Santa Clara County Probation Department (delinquency and status cases) |
Mode: | Automated data file (delinquency and status cases) |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
Santa Cruz County
Source: | Santa Cruz County Probation Department (delinquency and status cases) |
Mode: | Automated data file (delinquency and status cases) |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
Stanislaus County
Source: | Stanislaus County Probation Department (delinquency and status cases) |
Mode: | Automated data file (delinquency and status cases) |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
| 3. Data were reported for partial year only. |
Ventura County
Source: | Correction Services Agency (delinquency and status cases) |
Mode: | Automated data file (delinquency and status cases) |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
Colorado
Source: | Colorado Judicial Department |
Mode: | FY 1995 Annual Report: Statistical Supplement |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are petitioned case filings for fiscal year 1995. They include delinquency and status offense cases. |
| 2. Status figures were reported with delinquency cases. |
Connecticut
Source: | Chief Court Administrator�s Office |
Mode: | Automated data file |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
| 3. Dependency figures were not reported. |
| 4. Juvenile venue districts established by the State report data.
|
Delaware
Source: | Family Court of the State of Delaware |
Mode: | Statistical page sent to NCJJ |
Data: | 1. Total figures are petitioned and nonpetitioned delinquency and petitioned dependency filings received in fiscal year 1995. |
| 2. There is no statute on status offenders in this State; therefore, the court handles no status offense cases. |
District of Columbia
Source: | District of Columbia Superior Court |
Mode: | JCS survey form |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. They include status offenses and interstate compact figures. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
| 3. Dependency figures are cases disposed. |
Florida
Source: | Department of Juvenile Justice |
Mode: | Automated data file |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. They represent only those cases disposed by the Department of Juvenile Justice. Cases disposed by the Florida Network, the Department of Juvenile Justice�s major contracted provider of CINS/FINS centralized intake, are not included in these figures. |
| 3. The figures represent the number of cases disposed by Intake during 1995, which captures only those disposed cases reported to the Department of Children and Family Services by caseworkers correctly completing and submitting a "Client Information Form-CINS/FINS and Delinquency Intake." The Department of Children and Family Services, having a broad range of operations, reports information on other childcare services not part of the typical juvenile court system. Therefore, the number of nonpetitioned cases may appear higher and fluctuate more than those reported by other information systems that report only juvenile court activity. |
| 4. Florida reported its data by Department of Children and Family Services districts. Therefore, these districts were used as the reporting area. The following is a list of counties within districts. District 1: Escambia, Okaloosa, Santa Rosa, and Walton. District 2: Bay, Calhoun, Franklin, Gadsden, Gulf, Holmes, Jackson, Jefferson, Leon, Liberty, Madison, Taylor, Wakulla, and Washington. District 3: Alachua, Bradford, Columbia, Dixie, Gilchrist, Hamilton, Lafayette, Levy, Putnam, Suwannee, and Union. District 4: Baker, Clay, Duval, Nassau, and St. Johns. District 5: Pasco and Pinellas. District 6: Hillsborough and Manatee. District 7: Brevard, Orange, Osceola, and Seminole. District 8: Charlotte, Collier, De Soto, Glades, Hendry, Lee, and Sarasota. District 9: Palm Beach. District 10: Broward. District 11: Dade and Monroe. District 12: Flagler and Volusia. District 13: Citrus, Hernando, Lake, Marion, and Sumter. District 14: Hardee, Highlands, and Polk. District 15: Indian River, Martin, Okeechobee, and St. Lucie. |
| 5. On October 1, 1994, Juvenile Justice separated from the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services to become the Department of Juvenile Justice. |
Georgia
Source: | Administrative Office of the Courts |
Mode: | Statistical pages sent to NCJJ |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are the number of children disposed with a petition for calendar year 1995. |
| 2. Status figures are the number of children disposed with a petition for calendar year 1995. |
| 3. Dependency figures are the number of children disposed with a petition for calendar year 1995. |
| 4. Delinquency, status, and dependency figures may include a small percentage of children disposed without a petition. |
Hawaii
Source: | The Judiciary, Administrative Office of the Courts |
Mode: | Automated data file |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
| 3. Dependency figures are cases disposed. |
Idaho
Source: | Administrative Office of the Courts |
Mode: | Idaho Courts 1995 Annual Report Appendix |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. They include status offense cases. |
| 2. Status figures are reported with delinquency cases. |
| 3. Dependency figures are cases disposed. |
Illinois
Source: | Administrative Office of the Illinois Courts, Probation Division |
Mode: | 1995 Probation Statistics |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are the number of petitions filed. |
| 2. Status figures are the number of petitions filed. Minor requiring authoritative intervention (MRAI) and truancy counts were summed to determine status figures. |
| 3. Dependency figures are the number of petitions filed. Neglect/abuse and dependency counts were summed to determine dependency figures. |
Cook County
Source: | Circuit Court of Cook County, Juvenile Division (delinquency and status cases) |
Mode: | Automated data file (delinquency and status cases) |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
Indiana
Source: | Division of State Court Administration |
Mode: | 1995 Indiana Judicial Report, Volume II |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are petitioned cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are petitioned cases disposed. |
| 3. Dependency figures are petitioned cases disposed. |
Iowa
Source: | State Court Administrator |
Mode: | Statistical pages sent to NCJJ |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are the number of petitions. |
| 2. Dependency figures are the number of petitions. |
| 3. Iowa reported its data by judicial district. The following is a list of counties within judicial districts. District 1: Allamakee, Black Hawk, Buchanan, Chickasaw, Clayton, Delaware, Dubuque, Fayette, Howard, and Winneshiek. District 2: Boone, Bremer, Butler, Calhoun, Carroll, Cerro Gordo, Floyd, Franklin, Greene, Grundy, Hamilton, Hancock, Hardin, Humboldt, Marshall, Mitchell, Pocahontas, Sac, Story, Webster, Winnebago, Worth, and Wright. District 3: Buena Vista, Cherokee, Clay, Crawford, Dickinson, Emmet, Ida, Kossuth, Lyon, Monona, O�Brien, Osceola, Palo Alto, Plymouth, Sioux, and Woodbury. District 4: Audubon, Cass, Fremont, Harrison, Mills, Montgomery, Page, Pottawattamie, and Shelby. District 5: Adair, Adams, Clarke, Dallas, Decatur, Guthrie, Jasper, Lucas, Madison, Marion, Polk, Ringgold, Taylor, Union, Warren, and Wayne. District 6: Benton, Iowa, Johnson, Jones, Linn, and Tama. District 7: Cedar, Clinton, Jackson, Muscatine, and Scott. District 8: Appanoose, Davis, Des Moines, Henry, Jefferson, Keokuk, Lee, Louisa, Mahaska, Monroe, Poweshiek, Van Buren, Wapello, and Washington. |
Kansas
Source: | Kansas Bureau of Investigation |
Mode: | JCS survey form |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are petitioned cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are petitioned cases disposed and include dependency/neglect petition figures. |
| 3. Data for 1995 are incomplete due to reporting difficulties at the county level. |
Kentucky
Source: | Kentucky Administrative Office of the Courts |
Mode: | Statistical pages sent to NCJJ |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
| 3. Dependency figures are petitioned cases disposed. |
| 4. Total figures are petitioned cases disposed. They include delinquency, status offense, dependency, neglect, abuse, and paternity cases. |
Louisiana
Source: | Judicial Council of the Supreme Court of Louisiana |
Mode: | 1995 Annual Report |
Data: | 1. Total figures are new cases filed in district court. They include petitioned and nonpetitioned delinquency, dependency, status offense, special proceeding, and traffic cases. |
| 2. Figures shown for Caddo, East Baton Rouge, Jefferson, and Orleans Parishes include juvenile felony and misdemeanor charges and status offense cases filed. |
Maine
Source: | Administrative Office of the Courts |
Mode: | JCS survey form |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are all offenses committed by juveniles and include traffic cases and civil violations for fiscal year 1995. |
| 2. Status offenses are not handled in the juvenile court system. |
| 3. The numbers for the district courts were summed to determine county figures. The following is a list of district courts within counties. Androscoggin: Lewiston and Livermore Falls. Aroostook: Caribou, Fort Kent, Houlton, Madawaska, Presque Isle, and Van Buren. Cumberland: Bridgton and Portland. Franklin: Farmington. Hancock: Bar Harbor and Ellsworth. Kennebec: Augusta and Waterville. Knox: Rockland. Lincoln: Wiscasset. Oxford: Rumford and S. Paris. Penobscot: Bangor, Lincoln, Millinocket, and Newport. Piscataquis: Dover-Foxcroft. Sagadahoc: Bath/ Brunswick. Somerset: Skowhegan. Waldo: Belfast. Washington: Calais and Machias. York: Biddeford, Springvale, and York. |
Maryland
Source: | Department of Juvenile Justice |
Mode: | Automated data file |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
Massachusetts
Source: | Administrative Office of the Courts |
Mode: | Annual Report on the State of Massachusetts Court System; FY 1995. |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are complaints disposed and include motor vehicle violations. |
| 2. Status figures are petitions disposed. |
| 3. Dependency figures are cases disposed. |
| 4. Figures for Hampden, Suffolk, and Worcester Counties are incomplete because the units of counts for the corresponding Juvenile Court Departments were not compatible with the rest of the courts� unit of count. Bristol County figures are not displayed for the same reason. Essex County data are incomplete because the Amesbury district court data were not reported. |
| 5. Each defendant is counted as a single criminal case. |
Michigan
Source: | State Court Administrative Office |
Mode: | Automated data file and statistical pages sent to NCJJ |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed for the following counties: Alcona, Alpena, Barry, Bay, Cass, Charlevoix, Chippewa, Crawford, Emmet, Genesee, Grand Traverse, Huron, Isabella, Jackson, Lapeer, Macomb, Marquette, Monroe, Montmorency, Muskegon, Otsego, Presque Isle, Roscommon, Sanilac, Shiawassee, and Tuscola. |
| 2. Delinquency figures for the remaining counties are petitions filed. |
| 3. Status figures are petitions filed. |
| 4. Dependency figures are petitions filed. |
Minnesota
Source: | Minnesota Supreme Court Information System |
Mode: | Automated data file |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
Mississippi
Source: | Mississippi Department of Human Services, Division of Youth Services |
Mode: | Automated data file |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
| 3. Dependency figures are cases disposed. Only those dependency cases that came to the attention of the Office of Youth Services via court processing are included here. For a complete report of neglect and or abuse data for Mississippi, contact Ms. Jane Hudson, Director, Protection Department, Department of Human Services, Post Office Box 352, Jackson, MS 39205. |
Missouri
Source: | Department of Social Services, Division of Youth Services |
Mode: | Automated data file |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
| 3. Dependency figures are cases disposed. |
Montana
Source: | Montana Board of Crime Control (petitioned and nonpetitioned cases) Office of Court Administration (all reported cases) |
Mode: | Automated data file (petitioned and nonpetitioned cases) and 1995 Annual Caseload Statistics Report (all reported cases) |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
| 3. Cascade County figures are petition dispositions. They include delinquency, status offense, dependency and special proceedings cases. Due to the differing unit of count, these figures cannot be compared with those of the other counties. |
Nebraska
Source: | Nebraska Crime Commission |
Mode: | Automated data file |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are petitioned cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are petitioned cases disposed. |
| 3. Dependency figures are petitioned cases disposed. |
| 4. In Douglas County, only those cases processed through the county attorney�s office (petitioned cases) were reported. |
Nevada
Source: | Nevada Association of Chief Juvenile Probation Officers |
Mode: | Statistical pages sent to NCJJ |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are the number of referrals for calendar year 1995. |
| 2. Status figures are the number of referrals for calendar year 1995. |
New Hampshire
Source: | New Hampshire Supreme Court, Administrative Office of the Courts |
Mode: | Statistical pages sent to NCJJ |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are petitions filed. |
| 2. Status figures are petitions filed. |
| 3. Dependency figures are petitions filed. |
New Jersey
Source: | Administrative Office of the Courts |
Mode: | Automated data file |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
New Mexico
Source: | Children, Youth and Families Department |
Mode: | Statistical pages sent to NCJJ |
Data: | 1. Total figures are juvenile cases closed for fiscal year 1995. They include petitioned and nonpetitioned delinquency and status offense cases. |
| 2. Data for nonpetition cases were estimated by subtracting petition data from total referrals. |
| 3. New Mexico reported its data by judicial district. The following is a list of counties within judicial districts. District 1: Los Alamos, Rio Arriba, and Santa Fe. District 2: Bernalillo. District 3: Dona Ana. District 4: Guadalupe , Mora, and San Miguel. District 5: Chaves, Eddy, and Lea. District 6: Grant, Hidalgo, and Luna. District 7: Catron, Sierra, Socorro, and Torrance. District 8: Colfax, Taos, and Union. District 9: Curry and Roosevelt. District 10: De Baca, Harding, and Quay. District 11: McKinley and San Juan. District 12: Lincoln and Otero. District 13: Cibola, Sandoval, and Valencia. |
New York
Source: | Office of Court Administration (petitioned cases) and the State of New York, Division of Probation and Correctional Alternatives (nonpetitioned cases) |
Mode: | Statistical pages sent to NCJJ (petitioned cases) and JCS survey form (nonpetitioned cases) |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
| 3. Dependency figures are cases disposed. |
| 4. The petition information reflects data reported to the Office of Court Administration. It may not necessarily reflect the total number of cases processed through the court system. |
North Carolina
Source: | Administratve Office of the Courts |
Mode: | Statistical pages sent to NCJJ |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are offenses alleged in juvenile petitions during fiscal year 1995. |
| 2. Status figures are offenses alleged in juvenile petitions during fiscal year 1995. |
| 3. Dependency figures are conditions alleged in juvenile petitions during fiscal year 1995. They include dependent, neglected, and abused conditions. |
North Dakota
Source: | Supreme Court, Office of State Court Administrator |
Mode: | Automated data file |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
| 3. Dependency figures are cases disposed. |
Ohio
Source: | Supreme Court of Ohio |
Mode: | Ohio Courts Summary, 1995 |
Data: | 1. Total figures are total petition terminations. They include delinquency, traffic, neglect, abuse, depen- dent, unruly, custody, visitation, support, parentage, Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA), and adults contributing to the neglect, unruliness or delinquency of a minor cases. |
Cuyahoga County
Source: | Cuyahoga County Juvenile Court Division |
Mode: | Automated data file |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
| 3. Dependency figures are cases disposed. |
Oregon
Source: | Judicial Department |
Mode: | Statistical pages sent to NCJJ |
Data: | 1. Total figures are juvenile petitions filed. They include delinquency, status offense, dependency, special proceedings and termination of parental rights cases. |
Pennsylvania
Source: | Juvenile Court Judges� Commission |
Mode: | Automated data file |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status offenses in Pennsylvania are classified as dependency cases that were not reported. |
| 3. Dependency figures were not reported. |
| 4. Figures presented here do not match those found in the 1995 Pennsylvania Juvenile Court Disposition Report due to differing units of count. |
Rhode Island
Source: | Administrative Office of State Courts |
Mode: | Report on the Judiciary 1995 |
Data: | 1. Total figures are the number of wayward, delinquent, dependency, neglect, and abuse filings. |
| 2. The data were reported at the State level; no county breakdown was available. |
South Carolina
Source: | Department of Juvenile Justice |
Mode: | Automated data file |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
| 3. Dependency figures were not reported. |
South Dakota
Source: | Unified Judicial System |
Mode: | Automated data file |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
| 3. Dependency figures were not reported. |
| 4. Shannon County is a Native-American reservation that handles juvenile matters in the tribal court, which is not part of the State�s juvenile court system. |
Tennessee
Source: | Tennessee Council of Juvenile and FamilyCourt Judges |
Mode: | Automated data file |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
| 3. Dependency figures are cases disposed. |
Texas
Source: | Texas Juvenile Probation Commission |
Mode: | Automated data file |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
Harris County
Source: | Criminal Justice Policy Council |
Mode: | Automated data file |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
Utah
Source: | Administrative Office of the Courts |
Mode: | Automated data file |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
| 3. Dependency figures are cases disposed. |
Vermont
Source: | Supreme Court of Vermont, Office of the Court Administrator |
Mode: | Statistical pages sent to NCJJ |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are petitioned cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures were petitioned cases disposed. |
| 3. Dependency data are included in the status figures. |
Virginia
Source: | Department of Family and Youth Services |
Mode: | Automated data file |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
| 3. Bedford City reports with Bedford County; Fairfax City reports with Fairfax County; South Boston City reports with Halifax County. |
Washington
Source: | Office of the Administrator for the Courts |
Mode: | Automated data file (delinquency and status) and Caseloads of the Courts of Washington 1995 (dependency) |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are petitioned and nonpetitioned cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are petitioned and nonpetitioned cases disposed. |
| 3. Dependency figures are petitioned cases disposed. They include dependency, termination of parent child relationship, truancy, at-risk youth, and alternative residential placement cases. |
| 4. Wakiakum County reports with Pacific County; Garfield County reports with Asotin County; Franklin County reports with Benton County. |
| 5. King County reports only delinquency data that contribute to an individual�s criminal history record information. |
| 6. Differences in data entry practices among the juvenile courts may contribute to variations in the data. |
West Virginia
Source: | Juvenile Justice Committee |
Mode: | Automated data file |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are cases disposed. |
| 2. Status figures are cases disposed. |
| 3. Dependency figures were not reported. |
Wyoming
Source: | Supreme Court of Wyoming, Court Coordinator�s Office |
Mode: | Wyoming District Courts 1995 Caseload Statistics |
Data: | 1. Delinquency figures are petitions filed. |
| 2. Status figures are petitions filed. |
| 3. Dependency figures are petitions filed. |
| 4. Washakie County data were not available for the 1995 report. |
Juvenile Court Statistics 1995, May 1998
|