Introduction
In 2000, law enforcement agencies in the
United States made an estimated 2.4 million
arrests of persons under age 18.*
According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation
(FBI), juveniles accounted for 17%
of all arrests and 16% of all violent crime
arrests in 2000. The substantial growth in
the number of juvenile violent crime arrests
that began in the late 1980s peaked
in 1994. In 2000, for the sixth consecutive
year, the rate of juvenile arrests for Violent
Crime Index offensesmurder, forcible
rape, robbery, and aggravated assaultdeclined. Specifically, between 1994 and
2000, the juvenile arrest rate for Violent
Crime Index offenses fell 41%. As a result,
the juvenile violent crime arrest rate in
2000 was the lowest since 1985. The juvenile
murder arrest rate fell 74% from its
peak in 1993 to 2000, when it reached its
lowest level since at least the 1960s.
These findings are derived from data
reported annually by local law enforcement
agencies across the country to the
FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR)
Program. Based on these data, the FBI prepares
its annual Crime in the United States
report, which summarizes crimes known
to the police and arrests made during the
reporting calendar year. This information
is used to characterize the extent and
nature of juvenile crime that comes to
the attention of the justice system. Other
recent findings from the UCR Program
include the following:
- Of the nearly 1,600 juveniles murdered
in 2000, 38% were under 5 years of age,
68% were male, 52% were white, and
52% were killed with a firearm.
- Juveniles were involved in 9% of murder
arrests, 14% of aggravated assault arrests,
33% of burglary arrests, 25% of
robbery arrests, and 24% of weapons
arrests in 2000.
- Juvenile murder arrests increased substantially between 1987 and 1993. In
the peak year of 1993, there were about 3,800 juvenile arrests for murder.
Between 1993 and 2000, juvenile arrests for murder declined, with the
number of arrests in 2000 (1,200) less than one-third that in 1993.
- Juvenile arrest rates for burglary
declined 63% between 1980 and 2000.
- Between 1990 and 2000, the juvenile
proportion of all arrests for drug abuse
violations increased from 8% to 13%.
- Juvenile arrests for curfew and loitering
violations increased 81% between 1991
and 2000. In 2000, 28% of curfew arrests
involved juveniles under age 15 and
31% involved females.
- In 2000, 59% of arrests for running away
from home involved females and 39%
involved juveniles under age 15.
- Arrests of juveniles accounted for 12%
of all violent crimes cleared by arrest in
2000specifically, 5% of murders, 12%
of forcible rapes, 16% of robberies, and
12% of aggravated assaults.
* Throughout this Bulletin, persons under age 18 are
referred to as juveniles. See Notes.
What do arrest statistics
count?
To interpret the material in this Bulletin
properly, the reader must have a clear
understanding of what these statistics
count. The arrest statistics report the
number of arrests made by law enforcement
agencies in a particular year�not
the number of individuals arrested, nor
the number of crimes committed. The
number of arrests is not equivalent to
the number of people arrested because
an unknown number of individuals are
arrested more than once in the year. Nor
do arrest statistics represent counts of
crimes committed by arrested individuals
because a series of crimes committed by
one individual may culminate in a single
arrest, or a single crime may result in the
arrest of more than one person. This latter
situation, where many arrests result
from one crime, is relatively common in
juvenile law-violating behavior because
juveniles are more likely than adults to
commit crimes in groups. This is the primary
reason why arrest statistics should
not be used to indicate the relative proportion
of crime committed by juveniles
and adults. Arrest statistics are most appropriately
a measure of flow into the
criminal and juvenile justice systems.
Arrest statistics also have limitations for
measuring the volume of arrests for a
particular offense. Under the UCR Program,
the FBI requires law enforcement
agencies to classify an arrest by the
most serious offense charged in that
arrest. For example, the arrest of a youth
charged with aggravated assault and
possession of a controlled substance
would be reported to the FBI as an arrest
for aggravated assault. Therefore, when
arrest statistics show that law enforcement
agencies made an estimated
203,900 arrests of young people for drug
abuse violations in 2000, it means that a
drug abuse violation was the most serious
charge in these 203,900 arrests. An
unknown number of additional arrests in
2000 included a drug charge as a lesser
offense.
The juvenile proportion of arrests exceeded the juvenile proportion of
crimes cleared by arrest in each offense category, reflecting the fact
that juveniles are more likely to commit crimes in groups and are
more likely to be arrested than are adults |
|
Data source: Crime in the United States 2000 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing
Office, 2001), tables 28 and 38. |
What do clearance
statistics count?
Clearance statistics measure the proportion
of reported crimes resolved by an
arrest or other, exceptional means (e.g.,
death of the offender, unwillingness of
the victim to cooperate). A single arrest
may result in many clearances. For example,
1 arrest could clear 40 burglaries
if the person was charged with committing
all 40 of these crimes. Or multiple arrests
may result in a single clearance if
the crime was committed by a group of
offenders. For those interested in juvenile
justice issues, the FBI also reports information
on the proportion of clearances
attributed to the arrest of persons under
age 18. This statistic is a better indicator
of the proportion of crime committed by
this age group than is the arrest proportion,
although some concerns exist that
even the clearance statistic overestimates
the juvenile proportion of crimes.
For example, the FBI reports that persons
under age 18 accounted for 25%
of all robbery arrests but only 16% of all
robberies cleared in 2000. If it can be
assumed that offender characteristics of
cleared robberies are similar to those of
robberies that were not cleared, then it
would be appropriate to conclude that
persons under age 18 were responsible
for 16% of all robberies in 2000. However,
the offender characteristics of cleared
and noncleared robberies may differ for
a number of reasons. If, for example, juvenile
robbers were more easily apprehended
than adult robbers, the proportion
of robberies cleared by the arrest of
persons under age 18 would overestimate
the juvenile responsibility for all
robberies. To add to the difficulty in interpreting
clearance statistics, the FBI�s reporting
guidelines require the clearance
to be tied to the oldest offender in the
group if more than one person is arrested
for a crime.
In summary, while the interpretation of
reported clearance proportions is not
straightforward, these data are the closest
measure generally available of the
proportion of crime known to law enforcement
that is attributed to persons
under age 18.
|
|
Juvenile Arrests 2000 |
OJJDP Bulletin November 2002 |
|