Appendix C: Some Suggestions for Implementing Screening in the Organization Although it may seem simple to endorse the concept of performing careful worker screening prior to hiring the worker, in practice there are many details to consider. This section sets forth a series of steps for an organization to consider in implementing screening practices. This does not establish a standard of practice, nor is it the only set of steps for screening that can be developed. Rather, these suggestions are intended to further the dialog on screening in a concrete and practical way. Thus, organizations are encouraged to consider these (and other) ideas in developing screening practices and comprehensive abuse prevention measures. In addition, States, coalitions, and associations whose members serve the many discrete types of persons working (or volunteering) with vulnerable populations are encouraged to develop screening practices or policies aimed at those particular settings.
Develop a comprehensive written application form that informs applicants of the organization's screening policies and facilitates the ensuing background screening process. Matters to consider in the initial application process include:
An application form that includes a signed statement verifying the applicant's understanding that falsifying information is grounds for dismissal and/or other action. Conduct personal interviews that probe for more indepth information that may not be available through other screening mechanisms. Interview questions should be tailored to the needs of the setting and the role of the worker or volunteer. A standardized interview process would promote consistency among applicant interviews and help eliminate subjectivity associated with using multiple interviewers. Training on effective interview techniques, especially when delving into sensitive topic areas, would be of assistance. If possible, use of a team approach would increase objectivity, obtain different perspectives, and promote adequate documentation. Followup interviews may be needed as information surfaces through other background screening practices. Conduct reference checks (and, if appropriate, educational status checks).
Centralizing the reference-checking process and providing training would permit responsible staff to become persistent and deft in their inquiries. Fear of defamation or other lawsuits may limit the amount or detail of information a reference is initially willing to supply. Obtaining an applicant's written consent allowing for the release of information by previous employers may make for more effective reference checks. Some agencies ask references whether they know of any reason why the person should not be hired to work with the particular consumer population. Draft organizational policies on the appropriate use of criminal history information or other registry information to the extent this information is available, and develop specific criteria for using this information for screening purposes.
|