|
Preface
This is the 75th report in the Juvenile Court Statistics series. It describes the delinquency and status offense cases handled between 1985 and 2002 by
U.S.
courts with juvenile jurisdiction.1 National estimates of juvenile court delinquency caseloads in 2002 were based on analyses of 1,047,793 automated
case records and court-level statistics summarizing an additional 69,633 cases. Status offense case profiles
were based on 18 years of petitioned
status offense case records, including 2002 data submitted on 101,812 automated case-level records and court-level summary statistics on an additional 14,665 cases. The data used in the analyses were contributed
to the National Juvenile Court Data
Archive by more than 2,000 courts with jurisdiction over 75% of the juvenile
population in 2002.
The first Juvenile Court Statistics report
was published in 1929 by the
U.S.
Department of Labor and described
cases handled by 42 courts during 1927. During the next decade, Juvenile Court Statistics reports were based on statistics cards completed for each delinquency, status offense, and dependency case handled by the
courts participating in the reporting series. The Children’s Bureau (within the U.S. Department of Labor) tabulated
the information on each card, including age, gender, and race of the juvenile; the reason for referral; the manner of dealing with the case; and the final disposition of the case. During
the 1940s, however, the collection of case-level data was abandoned because
of its high cost. From the 1940s until the mid-1970s, Juvenile Court Statistics reports were based on the simple, annual case counts reported to the Children’s Bureau by participating
courts.
In 1957, the Children’s Bureau initiated
a new data collection design that enabled the Juvenile Court Statistics series to develop statistically sound, national estimates. The Children’s Bureau,
which had been transferred to the U.S. Department of Health, Education,
and Welfare (HEW), developed a probability sample of more than 500 courts. Each court in the sample was asked to submit annual counts of delinquency,
status offense, and dependency
cases. This design proved difficult
to sustain as courts began to drop out of the sample. At the same time, a growing number of courts outside
the sample began to compile comparable statistics. By the late 1960s, HEW ended the sample-based effort and returned to the policy of collecting annual case counts from any court able to provide them. The
Juvenile Court Statistics series, however,
continued to generate national estimates based on data from these nonprobability samples.
The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency
Prevention (OJJDP) became
responsible for Juvenile Court Statistics following the passage of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
Act of 1974. In 1975, OJJDP awarded the National Center for Juvenile
Justice (NCJJ) a grant to continue the report series. Although NCJJ agreed to use procedures established by HEW to ensure reporting continuity,
NCJJ also began to investigate methods of improving the quality and detail of national statistics. A critical innovation was made possible by the proliferation of computers during the 1970s. As NCJJ asked agencies across the country to complete the annual juvenile court statistics form, some agencies began offering to send the automated case-level data collected by their management information systems.
NCJJ learned to combine these automated records to produce a detailed
national portrait of juvenile court activity—the original objective of the Juvenile Court Statistics series.
The project’s transition from using annual case counts to analyzing automated
case-level data was completed with the production of Juvenile Court Statistics 1984. For the first time since the 1930s, Juvenile Court Statistics contained detailed, case-level descriptions
of the delinquency and status
offense cases handled by U.S. juvenile
courts. This case-level detail continues to be the emphasis of the reporting series.
1 This Report is a combined edition for 2001 and 2002. The national estimates and analyses
focus on 2002, but the state- and county-level caseload statistics in appendix C are presented separately for 2001 and 2002.
|