Most arrested juveniles were referred to court

In most states, some persons under age 18 are, due to their age or by statutory exclusion, under the jurisdiction of the criminal justice system. For arrested persons under age 18 and under the original jurisdiction of their state’s juvenile justice system, the FBI’s UCR Program monitors what happens as a result of the arrest. This is the only instance in the UCR Program in which the statistics on arrests coincide with state variations in the legal definition of a juvenile.

In 2002, 18% of arrests involving youth eligible in their state for processing in the juvenile justice system were handled within law enforcement agencies, 73% were referred to juvenile court, and 7% were referred directly to criminal court. The others were referred to a welfare agency or to another police agency. The proportion of arrests sent to juvenile court has increased gradually from 1990 to 2002 (from 64% to 73%). In 2002, the proportion of juvenile arrests sent to juvenile court was similar in cities (72%), suburban counties (74%), and rural counties (72%).

In 2002, juvenile arrest rates for murder, forcible rape, and robbery were at or near their lowest levels since at least 1980; the same was not true for the juvenile arrest rate for aggravated assault

Murder

Four charts showing juvenile arrest rates for murder, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault, 1980-2002.

Forcible Rape

Four charts showing juvenile arrest rates for murder, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault, 1980-2002.

Robbery

Four charts showing juvenile arrest rates for murder, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault, 1980-2002.

Aggravated Assault

Four charts showing juvenile arrest rates for murder, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault, 1980-2002.

  • The juvenile arrest rate for aggravated assault doubled between 1980 and 1994, generally paralleling the arrest rate trends for murder and robbery.

  • Unlike the juvenile arrest rate trends for murder and robbery, the decline (of 37%) in the juvenile arrest rate for aggravated assault between 1994 and 2002 did not erase the increase that began in the mid-1980s. The juvenile arrest rate for aggravated assault in 2002 was still 27% above the 1980 level.

Data source: Analysis of arrest data from the FBI and population data from the U.S. Bureau of the Census and the National Center for Health Statistics. [See data source note for detail.]

Juvenile arrest rate trends for the four offenses that make up the Property Crime Index show very different patterns over the 1980–2002 period

Burglary

Four charts showing juvenile arrest rates for burglary, larceny-theft, motor vehicle theft, and arson, 1980-2002.

Larceny-Theft

Four charts showing juvenile arrest rates for burglary, larceny-theft, motor vehicle theft, and arson, 1980-2002.

  • In 2002, 71% of all juvenile Property Crime Index arrests were for larceny-theft. The most common larceny-theft violation is shoplifting. Therefore, Property Crime Index arrest rate trends primarily reflect trends in larceny-theft and are influenced to a much lesser degree by the generally more serious property crimes of burglary, motor vehicle theft, and arson.

Motor Vehicle Theft

Four charts showing juvenile arrest rates for burglary, larceny-theft, motor vehicle theft, and arson, 1980-2002.

Arson

Four charts showing juvenile arrest rates for burglary, larceny-theft, motor vehicle theft, and arson, 1980-2002.

  • After being relatively stable for most of the 1980s, the juvenile arrest rate for arson grew 55% between 1987 and 1994.

  • With the exception of 2001, the juvenile arrest rate for arson declined each year between 1994 and 2002, falling in 2002 to a level near the lowest experienced in the 1980–2002 period.

Data source: Analysis of arrest data from the FBI and population data from the U.S. Bureau of the Census and the National Center for Health Statistics. [See data source note for detail.]

Previous Contents Next

Juvenile Arrests 2002 OJJDP Bulletin September 2004